Forensic Analysis of Antrim County Michigan Reveals Massive Voter Fraud

Screenshot

While the technical forensic analysis for Antrim County was revealed earlier today, websites posting it are taken down faster than most people can read.

Screenshot

Luckily I took screenshots and did a simplifying breakdown of it on my Facebook before the last link I was looking at got taken down.

It is VERY detailed, and very damning proof that election fraud not only occurred in Antrim county, but explains how and why all states using Dominion were likely manipulated, which is what caused all those weird negative counts, number switching on live TV, and mathematical impossibilities.

  1. The acceptable error rate put forth by the Federal Election Commission is .0008% (1 in 250k.) The error rate for Antrim County is an astounding and unacceptable 68.05%
  2. These “errors” cause ballots to be kicked over to hand adjudication, where a single person can alter, add, delete, move, or throw out a ballot at will. This is likely why GOP poll watchers were not being allowed to observe in many swing states election night, or kept as far away as possible from the screens.
  3. A staggering amount of ballots needed these “hand adjudications.” In Central Lake Township 1,222 ballots reversed out of 1,491 total…that means 81.96% of those ballots were decided by whatever human being was sitting in that chair.
  4. Who actually altered which ballots and how are currently untraceable, as adjudication logs for 2020 (but not previous years) were deleted of the computer despite it being illegal to do so. On November 21, 2020 a user attempted to zero out ALL data of the computer but failed, proving malicious intent and not a “computer glitch.”
  5. The USB sticks containing Dominion software also revealed different tabulation results during testing, depending on which ones are used. This is proof that a fractioning algorithm was used that allows one candidate’s vote to count more and the other less. That’s why we have different numbers coming up for the same ballots, and different candidate winners as results.
  6. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benton willfully lied about all of this, blaming it on an impossible “human error.” Between this and the complete lack of security of the machines themselves from hacking, malware, and remote manipulation through the internet…the election results for Michigan should absolutely not have been certified.

Keep in mind, this was just one county in Michigan and it was only caught initially by accident. All the issues and problems stated apply to ALL the states currently using the Dominion system, and explains why numbers in multiple states were “switching” and being taken from one candidate to another on live TV.

This country needs to redo this election without these machines ASAP.

Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

54 Comments

  1. Somebody essentially help to make significantly articles Id state This is the first time I frequented your web page and up to now I surprised with the research you made to make this actual post incredible Fantastic job.

  2. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  3. I just could not depart your web site before suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the usual information an individual supply in your visitors? Is gonna be again frequently in order to check up on new posts.

  4. Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?

  5. The forensic analysis details you provided about Antrim County are quite shocking and insightful. The way you highlighted the complexities of the data truly sheds light on the urgency of transparency in our electoral processes. It’s important that we remain vigilant and informed about such critical issues. For similar insights and data interpretation, I often rely on StubMath.

  6. The detailed breakdown of the forensic analysis in Antrim County is truly eye-opening; it seems like a pivotal moment in understanding the integrity of our electoral process. It’s fascinating to see how such complex technical data can reveal significant truths regarding voter fraud. I appreciate the effort you put into screenshotting the material before it gets taken down. For those looking to delve deeper into similar investigations, YouTubeGPT has been a tremendously helpful resource.

  7. The revelation surrounding the forensic analysis of Antrim County is quite striking; it seems to lay bare aspects of the voting process that many might have overlooked. The detailed documentation you described really highlights the importance of scrutinizing electoral integrity. I appreciate your effort in breaking it down for clarity. For anyone seeking to dive deeper into visualizing such data, I often turn to ChartStitch.

  8. The forensic details you provided about Antrim County are quite staggering; it’s hard to believe that such discrepancies could exist in the voting process. The implication of so many flaws raises crucial questions about election integrity. I appreciate your effort in breaking down such intricate information for better understanding. For anyone looking to keep up with complex topics like this, I often consult resources like Best Translation Earbuds.

  9. The forensic analysis findings for Antrim County are truly eye-opening. It’s alarming to see such detailed evidence being suppressed. The implications of this data could shift the narrative significantly, and it’s crucial for the public to have access to all sides of the story. For anyone looking to navigate this complex issue further, I often find helpful insights through SetList.

  10. The forensic analysis details for Antrim County are shocking and reveal layers that many would prefer to keep hidden. It’s encouraging to see such rigorous investigation being presented to hold the system accountable. The screenshots you provided are a crucial piece of evidence that need to be examined further. For those interested in uncovering more about election integrity, I often turn to Run From 67 for insights and analyses.

  11. The details you presented about the forensic analysis in Antrim County truly shed light on the underlying irregularities. It’s fascinating how quickly information can be obscured online while the facts demand attention. Your effort to screenshot and simplify the findings is invaluable for those trying to navigate this complex issue. For decoding similar intricate reports, I often rely on PDFTranslate.

  12. The insights from the forensic analysis of Antrim County are truly compelling; it raises serious questions about the integrity of the voting process. The detailed breakdown you provided really emphasizes the importance of transparency in elections. For anyone seeking more information on similar issues, I consistently find valuable insights and data through Dreamlux.

  13. The detailed forensic analysis presented in the post raises significant questions about the integrity of the electoral process in Antrim County. It’s alarming to see how quickly information can be suppressed. Your breakdown definitely sheds light on critical issues that need further examination. For anyone looking to dig deeper into similar analyses, I often refer to RoomMakeover for insightful resources.

  14. The detailed scrutiny of Antrim County’s voting process raises critical questions about election integrity. The evidence presented seems to challenge widely held assumptions, and it’s essential that we dive deeper into these findings. It’s fascinating how rapid the response has been in attempting to suppress information. For those interested in analyzing such data more effectively, I often rely on KcalMath for clarity in my research.

  15. The forensic analysis you provided shines a light on the serious discrepancies that many may have overlooked. It’s a strong reminder of the importance of transparency in our electoral processes. I appreciate the effort you took to compile and present these findings before they were taken down. Keeping the narrative alive is crucial! For anyone looking to track these kinds of updates, I often refer to MeltCheck for more context and insights.

  16. The forensic analysis details presented in this article are truly eye-opening. It’s astonishing how quickly information can be silenced, highlighting the importance of disseminating evidence that challenges the narrative. This kind of transparency is vital for maintaining trust in the electoral process and understanding the implications of such findings. I often use EmojiMaker for visual representation of complex ideas.

  17. The details about the forensic analysis in Antrim County are truly eye-opening, particularly the mention of how quickly the information is being taken down from various platforms. It raises serious questions about transparency and accountability in our electoral process. It’s alarming to see such potential evidence of fraud being suppressed. This entire situation has made me more vigilant and aware of where to find reliable information, including free resources like Spec Reference.

  18. The breakdown of the forensic analysis is astonishing; the level of detail provided really calls into question the integrity of the election process. It’s alarming to see how quickly information can be suppressed, highlighting the importance of transparency in our democratic systems. For those navigating these complex issues, I often find clarity through TradeBalancer.

  19. The detailed findings from Antrim County are indeed eye-opening, especially how they highlight potential discrepancies in voting patterns. This level of forensic analysis sheds light on issues we need to address for future elections. Understanding the implications of such findings is crucial for maintaining electoral integrity. For anyone looking to delve deeper into analyzing similar data patterns, I rely on YesOrNoAI for clarity and guidance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*