In an unbelievably ridiculous judgment, a panel of 3 judges in Idaho upheld a previous ruling that not paying for a convict’s sex change somehow went against his “8th Amendment rights.”
Because apparently NOT cutting off someone’s balls is “cruel and unusual punishment.” Alright then, I’ll remember that when I start pushing for the neutering of child molesters.
Logical? When did Idaho go full liberal, never go full liberal.
The convict in question is a convicted sexual predator as well. Adree Edmo was convicted of the sexual abuse of a child under 16, but he’s scheduled to be released in 2021.
He looks hideous.
The worst part of it is, you know the second this guy gets a sex change he’s going to demand to be moved to a woman’s prison instead…where he will be a sexual danger to the real women there.
When is enough, going to be enough? It’s bad enough these POS criminals get a roof over their head, 3 hot meals a day, and healthcare on our dime…but now we’ve got to pay tens of thousands of dollars to fund their vanity project?
How about a compromise, how about we split it? My tax dollars will gladly go to cutting off their dicks and balls, and they can be responsible for all that other stuff. Deal? ????
Leave a Reply