Saturday, January 23, 2021
  • News
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
Red, White, and F You
Saturday, January 23, 2021
  • News
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
Red, White, and F You
No Result
View All Result

Cry Me a River, Kamala

by David Moss
March 1, 2019
in Intersectionality, Leftism
0
Cry Me a River, Kamala
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT
826 Views

If we’re being brutally honest here, Senator, the invocation of the so-
called “Biden rule” in 2015 was more about frustrating Barack Obama more
than anything else, since the expectation was that Hillary would cruise to
the Presidency in 2016 and then would either re-nominate Merrick Garland or
put up her own (probably more liberal) pick. Once the GOP field took shape,
conventional wisdom held that Trump’s ascendancy was the death knell for any
hope of taking the White House, making that play the political equivalent of
betting the family home on filling an inside straight.

Incredibly, the bet paid off.

So when Trump won, your party took a page from the GOP playbook, dug in its
heels and vowed to “resist” at every turn. The fight over Neil Gorsuch’s
nomination in place of Garland was no exception; unfortunately for you,
Harry Reid had already “gone nuclear” in the 2013 tussle over the DC
Circuit, and it wasn’t a big leap to see that happening for SCOTUS
nomination — the only red line left uncrossed.

Now the smart play would have been to take the finger off the big red
button, and let Gorsuch through. After all, he was a replacement for Scalia
and the ideological balance of the Court wasn’t at stake; his elevation
would merely restore the delicate 4-4-1 balance that had been in place since
Bush II. Confirming Gorsuch (or, more accurately, not contesting his
appointment) would have given the Democrats significant political capital in
the public eye, and saved the ultimate weapon for when it really mattered;
when a liberal (or Kennedy) left the bench.

 

But no, your party leadership decided to be the mighty oak, standing proudly
against the storm, despite prudence dictating a more “reed-like” approach.
Bent egos and wounded pride coupled with an astonishing lack of foresight
led you to make your stand, with predictable results. It was, in truth, the political
equivalent of Pickett’s Charge, both psychologically and strategically.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now you find yourself at the commencement of what will be one of the most
influential Court picks in decades with no leverage but your tired, overworked
outrage… and nobody to blame except yourselves. You’re going to have all the
effectiveness of spectators in the Senate Gallery as the balance of the Court shifts
for a generation, at least.

Popcorn?

Author

  • David Moss
Tags: IntersectionalityKamala HarrisLeftist
David Moss

David Moss

Former liberal Current libertarian Enthusiastic gun owner Card-carrying member of the mainstream media

Next Post
20 REASONS YOU NEED A 30-ROUND MAGAZINE

20 REASONS YOU NEED A 30-ROUND MAGAZINE

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

No Content Available
ADVERTISEMENT

Recommended

Update: Megan Murphy Files Suit Against Twitter in Trans-Ban Case

2 years ago
Bystanders Harass Cops After Officer Fatally Shot

Bystanders Harass Cops After Officer Fatally Shot

2 years ago
ADVERTISEMENT

Tweet Us

Like Us

Newsletter

Sign up to get news directly to your inbox!


  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • My Tickets

© 2019 Red, White and F You

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Videos

© 2019 Red, White and F You